VMware ESX Guest OS I/O Timeout Settings (for NetApp Storage Systems)

October 29th, 2009 by jason Leave a reply »

You may already be aware that installing VMware Tools in a Windows VM configures a registry value which controls the I/O timeout for all Windows disk in the event of a short storage outage. This is to help the guest operating system survive high latency or temporary outage conditions such as SAN path failover or maybe a network failure in Ethernet based storage.  VMware Tools changes the Windows default value of 10 seconds for non-cluster nodes, 20 seconds for cluster nodes, to 60 seconds (or x03c hex).

Did you know that disk I/O timeout is a configurable parameter in other guest operating systems as well? And why not, it makes sense that we would want every guest OS to be able to outlast a storage deficiency.

NetApp offers a document titled VMware ESX Guest OS I/O Timeout Settings for NetApp Storage Systems. It’s published as kb41511 and you’ll need a free NetApp NOW account to access the document. This white paper serves a few useful purposes:

  • Defines recommended disk I/O timeout settings for various guest operating systems on NetApp storage systems
  • Defines benchmark disk I/O timeout settings for various guest operating systems which could be used on any storage system, including local SCSI
  • In some cases provides scripts to make the necessary changes
  • Explains the methods to make the disk I/O timeout changes on the following guest operating systems:
    • RHEL4
    • RHEL5
    • SLES9
    • SLES10
    • Solaris 10
    • Windows

Now on the subject disk I/O timeouts, understand the above is to be used as chance for extending the uptime of a VM during adverse storage conditions. As in life, there are no guarantees. A guest OS with high disk I/O activity may not be able to tolerate sustained read and/or write requests for the duration of the timeout value. Windows guests may freeze or BSOD. Linux guests may go read-only on their root volumes which requires a reboot. Which brings me to the next point…

A larger timeout value isn’t necessarily better. In extending disk I/O timeout values, we’re applying virtual duct tape to an underlying storage issue which needs further looking into. Given the complex and wide variety of shared storage systems available to the datacenter today, storage issues can be caused by many variables including but not limited to disks (spindles), target controllers, fabric components such as fibre cables, SFP/GBICs, HBAs, fabric switches, zoning, network components such as copper cabling, NICs, network switches, routers, and firewalls. Also keep in mind that while the OS may survive the disk I/O interruption, application(s) running on the OS platform may not.  Applications themselves implement response timeout values which are likely going to be hard coded and non-configurable by a platform or virtualization administrator in the application itself.

Lastly, try to remember that if you go through the effort of increasing your disk I/O timeout values on Windows guests beyond 60 seconds, future installation of VMware Tools or other applications/updates may reset the disk I/O timeout back to 60 seconds.  What this means is that in medium to large environments, you’re going to need an automated method to deploy custom disk I/O timeout values at least for Windows guests.  For those with NetApp storage, NetApp pushes these standards firmly, along with other VMware best practices which I’ll save for a future blog article.

Update 4/28/10:  VMware Tools for vSphere installation doesn’t change the disk timeout setting if a custom value was previously set (ie. 190 seconds)

Update 9/12/11:  See also VMware KB article 1009465 Increasing the disk timeout values for a Linux 2.6 virtual machine

Advertisement

8 comments

  1. You need to tune this setting when you have large numbers of volumes on NetApp clusters, too, since more volumes == longer cluster failover time.

    You need to fail over the cluster to do non-disruptive upgrades to ONTAP.

    Keep your maintenance needs in mind when you’re setting timeout values.

  2. jason says:

    Good points Justin!

  3. Leif Hvidsten says:

    I concur with Justin regarding cluster failovers and non-disruptive upgrades. It’s one of the large reasons NetApp has the host utility kits (HUK) for the various platforms connecting to their storage.
    Jason, thanks for pointing out this KB. NetApp is trying to make this easier with their Virtual Storage Console that was just released last week as a VC client plug-in. In there it is possible to attach an .iso with the timeout scripts through the plug-in on its “Tools” page.
    I haven’t had a chance to test it yet but am pretty excited to give this tool a run. It is replacing the ESX HUK that was installed in the COS.
    http://blogs.netapp.com/virtualstorageguy/2009/10/now-available-the-virtual-storage-console-vsphere-plug-in.html#more

  4. Chad Sakac says:

    Disclosure – I’m an EMC employee.

    The question of extending the guest timeouts, and the rationale behind it is also covered in the EMC/NetApp “Multivendor NFS” post which can be seen on my blog here http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2009/06/a-multivendor-post-to-help-our-mutual-nfs-customers-using-vmware.html as well as on Vaughn Stewart’s at NetApp.

    NetApp FAS and EMC Celerra (as well as all other clustered NAS platforms that I know of) is unbounded in NAS use cases – meaning that we work hard to make it as short as possible, but the amount of time it can take for a cluster failover varies based on a number of factors.

    It’s my opinion (not trying to imply it is that of NetApp’s, but I would exepct that it would be), that we believe that the long term goal is to progressively shorten and further bound (so it’s not dependent on variables) NAS failover time under the default OS timeout values so changes are not needed.

    Whereas some things that are very handy on NAS devices as compared to block models, architecturally, some things are a lot harder from an engineering standpoint – this is one of them.

  5. Chad Sakac says:

    Sorry – one typo… Meant to say:

    “NetApp FAS and EMC Celerra (as well as all other clustered NAS platforms that I know of) **cluster failover is** unbounded in NAS use cases – meaning that we work hard to make it as short as possible, but the amount of time it can take for a cluster failover varies based on a number of factors.

  6. Jase McCarty says:

    Well, I did somewhat of a follow up. A quick way to push changes out to a bunch of Windows guests remotely.

    Here’s the post:
    http://www.jasemccarty.com/blog/?p=393

    Thanks,
    Jase

Leave a Reply