<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symantec declares VMware VMotion unsupported</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2008/11/18/symantec-declares-vmware-vmotion-unsupported/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2008/11/18/symantec-declares-vmware-vmotion-unsupported/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=473#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Gary, my 110 VMs at work run SAV and VMotion and I&#039;m not experiencing any of the described issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, my 110 VMs at work run SAV and VMotion and I&#8217;m not experiencing any of the described issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2008/11/18/symantec-declares-vmware-vmotion-unsupported/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=473#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Although you don&#039;t specifically say, I presume it is the case that, with your 110 VMs, you have never experienced any of the issues that Symantec alludes to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although you don&#8217;t specifically say, I presume it is the case that, with your 110 VMs, you have never experienced any of the issues that Symantec alludes to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2008/11/18/symantec-declares-vmware-vmotion-unsupported/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=473#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Any SAV or SEP code running inside a guest VMware VM which has VMotion enabled is unsupported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any SAV or SEP code running inside a guest VMware VM which has VMotion enabled is unsupported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2008/11/18/symantec-declares-vmware-vmotion-unsupported/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=473#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m just need sleep, but it seems abit unclear to me.  Does this that all vm guests using sep are unsupported, or that the sep server itself is unsupported as a vm?  Or both?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just need sleep, but it seems abit unclear to me.  Does this that all vm guests using sep are unsupported, or that the sep server itself is unsupported as a vm?  Or both?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Siebert</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2008/11/18/symantec-declares-vmware-vmotion-unsupported/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Siebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=473#comment-136</guid>
		<description>The good news is that McAfee fully supports it and would be more then happy to have your business...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that McAfee fully supports it and would be more then happy to have your business&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2008/11/18/symantec-declares-vmware-vmotion-unsupported/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=473#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Even before I read the vinternals post I was thinking &quot;are these just common Symantec reliability problems that they can&#039;t find a solution for?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even before I read the vinternals post I was thinking &#8220;are these just common Symantec reliability problems that they can&#8217;t find a solution for?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

