Comments on: Uptime lost during VMotion http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/01/11/uptime-lost-during-vmotion/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:34:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: daVikes http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/01/11/uptime-lost-during-vmotion/comment-page-1/#comment-702 daVikes Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:54:27 +0000 http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=857#comment-702 Perhaps the answer is a metric for both types. Vmotion shouldn't count as downtime though. Perhaps the answer is a metric for both types. Vmotion shouldn’t count as downtime though.

]]> By: Habeeba http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/01/11/uptime-lost-during-vmotion/comment-page-1/#comment-553 Habeeba Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:53:48 +0000 http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=857#comment-553 As you said, you are using wp-super-cache. I cud see the comment "<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.326 seconds --> <!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-02-12 06:47:05 -->" on the bottom of the code. But when i refreshed ur page, the time in the comment became 06:49:06. in next refresh it went to 06:50:01 etc. Doesn't it mean that the cache file is creating all the time, one access the page? and it will give a reverse effect. I am also facing the same problem on my site eplmatches.com but if i switch it to wp-cache mode, it works. Do you have any idea. If you have please let me know b email. Many many thanks As you said, you are using wp-super-cache.

I cud see the comment “
”

on the bottom of the code.

But when i refreshed ur page, the time in the comment became 06:49:06. in next refresh it went to 06:50:01 etc.

Doesn’t it mean that the cache file is creating all the time, one access the page? and it will give a reverse effect.

I am also facing the same problem on my site eplmatches.com

but if i switch it to wp-cache mode, it works. Do you have any idea. If you have please let me know b email.

Many many thanks

]]> By: Hany Michael http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/01/11/uptime-lost-during-vmotion/comment-page-1/#comment-466 Hany Michael Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:01:47 +0000 http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=857#comment-466 Yes, I’ve noticed this as well sometime back when I was tracking the uptime of certain VMs. It’s very annoying since this information is sometimes important to show the availability of the VMs to the management for example. Regards Yes, I’ve noticed this as well sometime back when I was tracking the uptime of certain VMs. It’s very annoying since this information is sometimes important to show the availability of the VMs to the management for example.

Regards

]]> By: Steffen http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/01/11/uptime-lost-during-vmotion/comment-page-1/#comment-460 Steffen Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:17:57 +0000 http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=857#comment-460 I totally agree with you, Jason. The "VM-internal" uptime shouldnt be measured from the "outside", the Virtual Infrastructure. This should be part of the operating system inside the VM (e.g. uptime in Linux). The uptime metric should reflect the uptime from the virtual hardware. Hopefully this bug gets fixed someday. BR Steffen I totally agree with you, Jason. The “VM-internal” uptime shouldnt be measured from the “outside”, the Virtual Infrastructure. This should be part of the operating system inside the VM (e.g. uptime in Linux). The uptime metric should reflect the uptime from the virtual hardware. Hopefully this bug gets fixed someday.

BR
Steffen

]]>