<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware raises the bar on CPU consolidation ratio support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/01/vmware-raises-the-bar-on-cpu-consolidation-ratio-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/01/vmware-raises-the-bar-on-cpu-consolidation-ratio-support/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a_user</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/01/vmware-raises-the-bar-on-cpu-consolidation-ratio-support/comment-page-1/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>a_user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1295#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>Were averaging 40:1 on 2950&#039;s 2 x 4core, 32gb. and 60:1 on r710&#039;s 2 x 4core, 72gb. 30 hosts, 600 vm&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were averaging 40:1 on 2950&#8242;s 2 x 4core, 32gb. and 60:1 on r710&#8242;s 2 x 4core, 72gb. 30 hosts, 600 vm&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norm</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/01/vmware-raises-the-bar-on-cpu-consolidation-ratio-support/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1295#comment-717</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve pushed 100:1 production Windows boxes. Dell R900 4x4 with 128GB RAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve pushed 100:1 production Windows boxes. Dell R900 4&#215;4 with 128GB RAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/01/vmware-raises-the-bar-on-cpu-consolidation-ratio-support/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1295#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Personally I haven&#039;t seen anything hight than 50:1 (non-VDI!!). And these were low utilized VM&#039;s... But it&#039;s a good thing these numbers are increasing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I haven&#8217;t seen anything hight than 50:1 (non-VDI!!). And these were low utilized VM&#8217;s&#8230; But it&#8217;s a good thing these numbers are increasing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/01/vmware-raises-the-bar-on-cpu-consolidation-ratio-support/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1295#comment-690</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s more the exposure of 170 VMs on a single host and do we want to go down that road.&quot;

Exactly. 

I have hit this limit in our _engineering lab_ but will never suggest we go anywhere near that in production!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s more the exposure of 170 VMs on a single host and do we want to go down that road.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. </p>
<p>I have hit this limit in our _engineering lab_ but will never suggest we go anywhere near that in production!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
