<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Configure VMware ESX(i) Round Robin on EMC Storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared P</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-3888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-3888</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Great article.  I just wanted to comment that my findings were similar to what Kevin K suggested (at least for ESX 4.1).  Changing the SATP for each device with the esxcli command wasn&#039;t necessary... the host reboot step took care of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Great article.  I just wanted to comment that my findings were similar to what Kevin K suggested (at least for ESX 4.1).  Changing the SATP for each device with the esxcli command wasn&#8217;t necessary&#8230; the host reboot step took care of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>Active/Passive is the recommended configuration for the NS-120.  Although you have one server_3 data mover sitting idle, it&#039;s needed for failover in the event the server_2 data mover fails.  IIRC the Celerra NS-120 does not support failover or redundancy in an active/active data mover configuration.  All of that said, configure your iSCSI target portal(s) on the Celerra.  On the ESX/ESXi host side, there are numerous articles which discuss the configuration of multipathing with VMware swISCSI:  Create a vSwitch, bind at least 2 vmnics to it, create 2 VMkernel portgroups (vmknics), configure each portgroup to use 1 active vmnic from the vSwitch, and set the other vmnic to not used (don&#039;t configure for standby).  Lastly you&#039;d use esxcli in vSphere 4 to bind each portgroup to the swISCSI adapter.  With vSphere 5 (released today), this can all be performed via a GUI method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Active/Passive is the recommended configuration for the NS-120.  Although you have one server_3 data mover sitting idle, it&#8217;s needed for failover in the event the server_2 data mover fails.  IIRC the Celerra NS-120 does not support failover or redundancy in an active/active data mover configuration.  All of that said, configure your iSCSI target portal(s) on the Celerra.  On the ESX/ESXi host side, there are numerous articles which discuss the configuration of multipathing with VMware swISCSI:  Create a vSwitch, bind at least 2 vmnics to it, create 2 VMkernel portgroups (vmknics), configure each portgroup to use 1 active vmnic from the vSwitch, and set the other vmnic to not used (don&#8217;t configure for standby).  Lastly you&#8217;d use esxcli in vSphere 4 to bind each portgroup to the swISCSI adapter.  With vSphere 5 (released today), this can all be performed via a GUI method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>I have a Celerra NS120 and the SP&#039;s are configured active passive. How do I configure iSCSI MPIO (from ESX 4.1) and what will happen in the case of a SP failover?
Second, I keep reading to change the failover mode to 4 to support ALUA. Is ALUA supported with iSCSI MPIO? How and where do I enable failover mode 4 via Unisphere for a Celerra? I&#039;m running Flare 30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Celerra NS120 and the SP&#8217;s are configured active passive. How do I configure iSCSI MPIO (from ESX 4.1) and what will happen in the case of a SP failover?<br />
Second, I keep reading to change the failover mode to 4 to support ALUA. Is ALUA supported with iSCSI MPIO? How and where do I enable failover mode 4 via Unisphere for a Celerra? I&#8217;m running Flare 30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to vSphere-land! &#187; Storage Links</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to vSphere-land! &#187; Storage Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>[...] PSP and SATP in Plain English (Stephen Foskett) Configure VMware ESX(i) Round Robin on EMC Storage (boche.net) What&#8217;s that ALUA exactly? (Yellow Bricks) Pluggable Storage Architecture, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PSP and SATP in Plain English (Stephen Foskett) Configure VMware ESX(i) Round Robin on EMC Storage (boche.net) What&#8217;s that ALUA exactly? (Yellow Bricks) Pluggable Storage Architecture, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vSphere Round Robin MultiPathing &#171; Phil the Virtualizer</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-3065</link>
		<dc:creator>vSphere Round Robin MultiPathing &#171; Phil the Virtualizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-3065</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your post, especially the part with navisphere not showing the correct failover mode. navcli shows failover mode=4 (which is correct), navisphere still shows 1.
Maybe you should point out, that useANO is only necessary when using single targets per initiator. And did you set IOPS=1 finally?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post, especially the part with navisphere not showing the correct failover mode. navcli shows failover mode=4 (which is correct), navisphere still shows 1.<br />
Maybe you should point out, that useANO is only necessary when using single targets per initiator. And did you set IOPS=1 finally?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>@Chris 
I&#039;m not sure how older versions of ESX would see it but I have the hardware to test that out in the lab.  My thought is that it&#039;s not going to be a supported configuration betweeen hypervisor and storage vendor.  When I enabled ALUA on the NS-120, it was with the specific knowledge that my hypervisor was ALUA aware and it would be a supported configuration between the two partners.  The NS-120 doesn&#039;t ship with ALUA enabled out of the box.  The failover mode = 4 configuration change was required by (then) Navisphere to turn on ALUA goodness.  The question we are kicking around is how does a non-ALUA aware hypervisor see a non-optimal ALUA path: Is it active, or is it passive?  From an array standpoint, it&#039;s active, but non-optimal.  My guess is the hypervisor will see 1 active optimal path but will not see the non-optimal path with useANO=0.  If useANO=1, then my hunch is ESX will see both paths as active.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris<br />
I&#8217;m not sure how older versions of ESX would see it but I have the hardware to test that out in the lab.  My thought is that it&#8217;s not going to be a supported configuration betweeen hypervisor and storage vendor.  When I enabled ALUA on the NS-120, it was with the specific knowledge that my hypervisor was ALUA aware and it would be a supported configuration between the two partners.  The NS-120 doesn&#8217;t ship with ALUA enabled out of the box.  The failover mode = 4 configuration change was required by (then) Navisphere to turn on ALUA goodness.  The question we are kicking around is how does a non-ALUA aware hypervisor see a non-optimal ALUA path: Is it active, or is it passive?  From an array standpoint, it&#8217;s active, but non-optimal.  My guess is the hypervisor will see 1 active optimal path but will not see the non-optimal path with useANO=0.  If useANO=1, then my hunch is ESX will see both paths as active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>Jason. This is awesome. Thank you. 

Question. Let&#039;s say you have a mixture of ESX 3.5 U5 and 4.0 U2 hosts (I know its not the most optimal setup, but it&#039;s not my env either), since the 3.5 hosts are not ALUA aware would they still see the array as Active/Passive with Failover mode 4 while the vSphere hosts would see it as Active/Active? Let me know what you think. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason. This is awesome. Thank you. </p>
<p>Question. Let&#8217;s say you have a mixture of ESX 3.5 U5 and 4.0 U2 hosts (I know its not the most optimal setup, but it&#8217;s not my env either), since the 3.5 hosts are not ALUA aware would they still see the array as Active/Passive with Failover mode 4 while the vSphere hosts would see it as Active/Active? Let me know what you think. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to enable ALUA and Round Robin Multipathing with ESX and Clariion CX4 &#171; Marco Galli</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>How to enable ALUA and Round Robin Multipathing with ESX and Clariion CX4 &#171; Marco Galli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-2620</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Halek</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-1794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Halek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-1794</guid>
		<description>We struggled for days trying to get this to work on a Clariion. After vmware support and EMC support, we needed to go into Navisphere in Engineering mode (ctrl+shift+f12) and check all 4 host initiators as only one was being used. another hidden feature I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We struggled for days trying to get this to work on a Clariion. After vmware support and EMC support, we needed to go into Navisphere in Engineering mode (ctrl+shift+f12) and check all 4 host initiators as only one was being used. another hidden feature I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enabling Round Robin and MPIO on ESXi 4 &#124; i n b a u d w e t r u s t</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Enabling Round Robin and MPIO on ESXi 4 &#124; i n b a u d w e t r u s t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>[...] vStorage Multi Paths Options in vSphere Configure VMWare ESXi Round Robin on EMC Storage Best Practices for HP EVA, vSphere 4 and Round Robin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vStorage Multi Paths Options in vSphere Configure VMWare ESXi Round Robin on EMC Storage Best Practices for HP EVA, vSphere 4 and Round Robin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>@Rich I think that was the key difference.  The LUNs had already been presented to the ESX hosts prior to configuring them for ALUA afterwards.  In this scenario, the host required a reboot to recognize the change.  I suppose removing the LUNs and readding them would have also worked, however that was not an option as they contained data and running VMs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rich I think that was the key difference.  The LUNs had already been presented to the ESX hosts prior to configuring them for ALUA afterwards.  In this scenario, the host required a reboot to recognize the change.  I suppose removing the LUNs and readding them would have also worked, however that was not an option as they contained data and running VMs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techstarts</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>Techstarts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rich, will look forward Active/Active vs RR. I might be able to produce them in few weeks. I&#039;m reading mastering vSphere and that is where my basic understanding is coming from. I read today, if you change the path selection/Load balancing policy to RR(which is not detected automatically), you have to manually set it SATP. Hope it helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rich, will look forward Active/Active vs RR. I might be able to produce them in few weeks. I&#8217;m reading mastering vSphere and that is where my basic understanding is coming from. I read today, if you change the path selection/Load balancing policy to RR(which is not detected automatically), you have to manually set it SATP. Hope it helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>@Techstarts In my testing, I would agree with Kevin K.  The SATP properly detected the CLARiiON in ALUA mode.  But, it did not do so when I just changed the Failover Mode for the host.  I had to unpresent and represent the LUN to have it detected.  I&#039;m guessing, as Kevin K. mentioned, that the evaluation of the rules only happens during the initial scan or at boot.

I&#039;d also like to mention that in my testing, Round Robin provided a significant performance increase over MRU.  This was on an HP EVA which is active/active and which ESX sets to MRU by default.  I haven&#039;t had an opportunity to compare MRU/RR/PP on the CLARiiON yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Techstarts In my testing, I would agree with Kevin K.  The SATP properly detected the CLARiiON in ALUA mode.  But, it did not do so when I just changed the Failover Mode for the host.  I had to unpresent and represent the LUN to have it detected.  I&#8217;m guessing, as Kevin K. mentioned, that the evaluation of the rules only happens during the initial scan or at boot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to mention that in my testing, Round Robin provided a significant performance increase over MRU.  This was on an HP EVA which is active/active and which ESX sets to MRU by default.  I haven&#8217;t had an opportunity to compare MRU/RR/PP on the CLARiiON yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techstarts</title>
		<link>http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/04/configure-vmware-esxi-round-robin-on-emc-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-1596</link>
		<dc:creator>Techstarts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boche.net/blog/?p=1988#comment-1596</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m kind of surprised to read that SATP is not detected automatically. In fact it is NMP&#039;s function to detect array type and apply specific SATP. either i have not understood correctly or something is wrong in NMP. NMP must detect the array type. i.e what
esxcli nmp satp list --signifies.

Many thanks for this post. I believe Round Robin is not better without PowerPath VE, in fact Active/Active best and reliably if you have high consolidation ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of surprised to read that SATP is not detected automatically. In fact it is NMP&#8217;s function to detect array type and apply specific SATP. either i have not understood correctly or something is wrong in NMP. NMP must detect the array type. i.e what<br />
esxcli nmp satp list &#8211;signifies.</p>
<p>Many thanks for this post. I believe Round Robin is not better without PowerPath VE, in fact Active/Active best and reliably if you have high consolidation ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

