Posts Tagged ‘Training’

Thank You

February 27th, 2010

Once in a while, I’m a witness to acts of extraordinary kindness from a person or group of persons.  It may not occur on a regular basis, but when it does, it is something special to behold.  It happened this afternoon at the Minneapolis Area VMware Users Group (VMUG) meeting.

It started out as a fairly typical event.  I called the meeting to order, briefly went through some general business and current events in the VMware virtualization community, and then turned the meeting over to our first speakers Craig Drugge and Pavan Jhamnani of Syncsort.  I took a seat, prepared to learn about Syncsort’s data protection and rapid recovery technologies.  However that was not to be, at least not right away.  Instead, Pavan invited Michael Cardinal of ThinLaunch up on stage.  I was curious about what was transpiring since this was Syncsort’s hour and I wasn’t aware that ThinLaunch had any ties to Syncsort’s technology.

Michael took the stage with a white paper bag in hand and began speaking to the audience about a person he has known for a few years.  A person who diggs virtualization.  A person whom he’d bumped into at VMware Partner Exchange early Wednesday morning at Starbucks Mandalay Bay.  I caught on pretty quickly that he was referring to me.  Michael proceeded to announce my recent VCDX certification accomplishment.  I thought that was extremely generous of him, but there was more.  Michael asked me to come up on stage where he presented me with a gift.  This was something that he, his wife, and Bill Hinkens (Territory Manager, VMware) collaborated on.  Michael turned the bag around to reveal the VMware diamond plate artwork along with my name and VCDX #34 on it.  Inside the bag was a black VMware fleece sweater, again with my name, VCDX, and #34 on it.  I was at a loss for words.  I accpeted the gift, thanked Michael, and we took our seats. The meeting continued from its brief diversion.

The sweater, the bag, the presentation, the planning, the thought, these were all wonderful gifts from a group of people who went out of their way which I will remember for a long time.  Virtualization, for me, has built a great community of people and in many cases has yielded friendships at a professional as well as a personal level.  For that I am very thankful and each day I look forard to what the future brings.

Thank you.

VCDX #34 – The Conclusion of a Journey

February 19th, 2010

Last Sunday I wrote about my VCDX Defense experience. This evening I am fortunate enough to share the news that I have passed the final board review and have achieved VCDX certification. I was awarded VCDX #34.  For the others who defended last week in Las Vegas, I offer my congratulations to you all on a job which I’m sure was well done.  Without a doubt, it was a journey which I’m sure will benefit me for many years to come.  I’m proud to have walked down a path paved by so much collective brilliance before me. I am inspired and driven by the knowledge shared in the virtualization community. I hope that I can continue provide the best I have to offer in return.

It is not my intent to turn this into the Acadamy Awards, but I would be extremely negligent if I didn’t thank key people who devoted their time to ensure my success by reviewing my design, challenging me with questions, as well as those who provided tips and encouragement for the defense.  I had several weaknesses exposed and with your help I was able to strengthen in those areas prior to my defense.

Amy (I didn’t receive your note until after the defense, but I was really touched. Your support, patience, and understanding is nothing short of amazing)
Gary Bowman (old guy… mock defense was very helpful!)
Gabrie Van Zanten (seriously, with the questions, you had too much fun…)
Roger Lund (great questions from you, thank you for taking the time)
David Davis (tremendous help from a CCIE… I’m not even worthy)
Scott Lowe (thank you for the offer and last minute design tips)
Michael Cardinal (Wednesday morning shot of confidence at Starbucks)
Rick Scherer (tips on calming nerves were great – I followed to a T)
John Arrasjid (so many great VCDX tips, invaluable!)
Duncan Epping (I got a lot more than breakfast out of you Tuesday morning, you don’t even know)
Frank Denneman (thank you for the help, confidence, & for not making faces at me)
Rich Brambley (UGG who told me Tuesday evening I can do this)
Andrew Hald (Tuesday dinner.. thank you for letting me join you)
Spencer Critchlow (your tips were invaluable!)
Doug Hazelman (Veeam played a helpful role in my design)
Dawn Theirl (thank you for the encouragement)

Tips for the Defense:
1) Know your design, I mean really know it.
2) Refer to tip #1

Good luck.

My VCDX Defense Experience

February 14th, 2010

Last Wednesday morning in Las Vegas, I participated in my VMware Certified Design Expert (VCDX) Defense.  A successful Defense is the last in a series of required steps to obtain VCDX certification.  Defense experiences have been shared by others such as Rick Scherer, Dave Convery, and Duncan Epping.  I found my own Defense experience to be similar to theirs.

Prior to the Defense, I submitted an application and a design for the panelists to review.  As Dave Convery pointed out, this may be the hardest part of the entire process as far as the volume of work goes.  The design is a complete set of documentation that must meet key requirements outlined in the application.  There is not a lot of time to complete the application and design once you are invited for that step.  My best advice would be to clear your schedule as much as possible to crank out quality documentation.  Also, be sure the application is filled out completely and the design covers all requirements.  Missing information risks outright rejection and you’ll likely miss the opportunity for the upcoming defense.  It is absolutely critical that all fields in the application are completed.  This cannot be stressed enough. The panelists will spend up to 8 hours reviewing the design.  The submitted documentation is more about quality than quantity. Be sure the documentation submitted is relavant to the design.  Any information the panelists cannot pull from the submitted design will need to be clarified during the defense which is then a pressure situation for the candidate.

Once the application and design is accepted, the defense date is scheduled around a major VMware event.  Typically VMworld or Partner Exchange (PEX).  My defense was scheduled at PEX in Las Vegas.  As I am not a partner nor do I work for a partner, I did not attend PEX or any of its sessions.  I flew in on a Tuesday morning and left a day later, merely for the defense. This strategy is fine with me as I would rather stay focused on the defense and my design, and not face daily distractions and new information released at a conference.

During the days leading up to my defense, I felt very confident.  I had been studying my design and going over all the Enterprise Admin and Design exam study material on a daily basis.  I had been brushing up on white papers and blog articles for areas which I felt I was weak on or had forgotten details of.  I brought a 3 ring binder filled with about 400 pages of documentation as well as every VI3 published .pdf known to mankind on my thumb drive.  While I didn’t read all the .pdf files, they were with me if I needed them for reference.  As it turned out, a few of the documents I crammed on the night before my panel would play a nice role during part of my defense.

After arriving in Las Vegas Tuesday morning, my confidence level remained as high as ever.  I had spent the entire 3 hours on the plane reading out of my 3 ring binder.  Outside of having breakfast with a friend, I spent a good portion of Tuesday studying which was my intent in booking a Tuesday morning arrival.  Early Tuesday afternoon, exhaustion hit me like a ton of bricks. I decided to try to take a nap. I laid in bed for close to an hour and couldn’t fall asleep. I decided to try a long bath in my swanky bathroom with a TV in it (my favorite part of the trip I think). I got my second wind and attended a meeting Tuesday evening for about an hour where I met up with fellow vExperts.  Asked how I felt about the following morning’s defense, again my answer was mostly confident, cool, and collected.  I just wanted to get it over with.  The anxiety of the approaching defense date was starting to mount.  I found myself calculating the hours remaining in my head. “In 15 hours I will have started my defense.  In 17 hours I will have finished the first defense section.  In 18 hours it will all be over with.”  After the meeting, some of the guys were going out on the strip for a nice dinner.  I really wanted to go but knew had no time for this social event.  I hung back and had a quick buffet dinner with a guy who I would find out was a VCDX himself and a panelist from VMware.  I was back to my room by 8:30pm and studied until about 10:15pm.  At that point, I was getting tired and decided to take the wise advice of Rick Scherer and John Arrisjid by getting a good night’s sleep.

I was getting good sleep until… I woke up at 3:30am and couldn’t fall back asleep.  I laid in bed for a full 2.5 hours thinking about my upcoming defense, points I wanted to make, design choices, etc. It’s a long time to dwell on these items but it was quiet and peaceful and I was well rested. I shot out of bed at my 6am wake up call, got ready, packed, and headed out.  I stopped by the hotel business center to print 4 copies of a presentation slide update I had made the night before. I forgot to print current slide only and instead printed 4 copies of the entire deck. Expensive lesson printing 60 pages which couldn’t be cancelled (how convenient for the hotel). At least they were in B&W and not color. The plan was to get a good breakfast to calm any nerves that may develop (advice from Rick Scherer).  Unfortunately, there was no breakfast open at 6:30am. The restaurants didn’t open until 7am.  I headed to Starbucks to start getting caffienated. While having coffee and going through my slides, I decided to create 3 new slides right then and there.  I felt they would be beneficial for the executive presentation but a small part of me challenged “is this really wise throwing these in at the last second?”  Why not.  SEs do it all the time prior to arriving at customer sites.  At this point I still felt pretty confident and didn’t really have any nerves.

At 7:30 I finished my coffee and headed to breakfast. Last minute cramming at the breakfast buffet table downing coffee and some food. As the clock passed 8am, I had less than an hour left to head upstairs for my defense panel.  I could start to feel the nervousness set in. I continued to study until I realized it was 8:50am and I had less than 10 minutes to get through the casino over to 2nd level of the convention center. Whoops.  I arrived at Breakers L with maybe 2 minutes to spare and Melissa greeted me.  The panelists were waiting inside and not quite ready for me yet. In the mean time, I walked across the hall and poked my head in a large auditorium to see who was speaking. It was Steve Herrod talking about a technology which I cannot repeat at this point in time. I told myself repeatedly that I am not nervous but I was only lying to myself. It’s inevitible. When the exam room doors open and you see the panel of experts in there, you feel it. I surmise it may be a bit like meeting the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost for the first time. People who spend a lot of time in front of customers are still nervous for these defense panels. It’s unavoidable. One candidate who finished his defense Tuesday evening likened the experience to having “a proctology exam”.

The first 75 minutes is spent “defending” my design.  I’ve got about a 15 slide deck to get through and to use as reference throughout the design defense.  I recommend putting as much reference as you can in the slide deck which you can yourself refer to during the defense.  It will help illustrate design choices and jog your memory for design elements which you’ve forgotten due to nervousness. The first 5-10 minutes I was pretty nervous and stuttered once or twice during my presentation. After that, I warmed up and it felt more like a good technical discussion with co-workers which I enjoyed. As the questions started coming in, I made good use of some of the slides to help explain decisions.  Good slides to have here are architecture diagrams, network, storage, etc.  I felt my performance during this section of the defense was passable based on the questioning I received, but the honest truth is it’s too hard to tell with the scoring method that is used.  It’s about accumulating points.  What’s unknown is how many points were left to accumulate and areas to talk about which we did not get to due to the 75 minutes of time expiring? Afterwards, I can’t help but think about 1 technical question I knew I jumped the gun on and answered incorrectly, failing to correct myself. I’m told by a current VCDX to not worry about it, nobody is perfect in the defense – that is to say, the scoring of the defense will allow for X number of mistakes. I’ve also spent time playing back other areas of the defense, wondering if I clarified my points clear enough? Trying to remember if the panelists understood that one of the points I was making was in the context of a specific circumstance and it would be important that they would understand that for it to be technically correct.  Did they understand the physical network topology well enough between sites or draw a harmful conclusion that I was contradicting myself during explanation?  I can’t stress enough how fast the time elapses in front of the panel.  At least it did for me.

After the 75 minute defense, we took a short break and proceeded with the 30 minute mock design.  In retrospect, the scenario which was thrown at me wasn’t too bad.  Unfortunately I didn’t get through nearly as much of it as I wanted to.  I spent a lot of time digging in areas where there were probably no more points to be had I should have just moved on.  I wish I had another shot at it and I would have moved faster.  The idea in this section is to ask a lot of intelligent questions to frame out a design in 30 minutes.  But don’t spend too much time in one area.  This section is more about “the journey” than the final design.  Questions need to be asked of the “customers” during the design process so they can see how you think on your feet.  They may also not provide all of the needed information for the design which is, again, where asking questions comes in.  Once again, time flies.  Be quick but be as thorough as possible.  Think out loud.

After completing the 30 minute mock design section, we moved right into the last section which is a 15 minute troubleshooting scenario.  The three panelists are once again the customers in this scenario and they came to me with a VMware Infrastructure 3 problem they are experiencing.  Once again, this process is more about “the journey” than the final result.  It’s about thinking out loud, asking questions of the customer, and showing them the throught process to isolate root cause of a problem. I feel I did well in this section and will go so far as to say that I found the root cause. Before I could get acknowledgement, however, the 15 minute timer expired.  I do not know how each section is weighted, if it is, but hopefully I did do well enough on the last section to help carry me through the two previous sections.  A common occurrance through the Enterprise Admin and Design written exams was that I felt I did poorly in one section, but stellar in another, which carried me through to a passing score on each written exam.

The panelists and observers were a good group of people and I can honestly say that once I got beyond that first 5-10 minutes of nerves, the pressure wasn’t nearly as bad as I thought it would be.  I think it all depends on how prepared one is for the experience.  You may have heard other people say “Know your design inside and out”. This could not be closer to the truth. Know it up, down, sideways, back, and front. Be prepared for any question relating to your design, including upstream and downstream impacts. Know the infrastructure components well such as storage and hardware platforms. Anything you list in your design you need to be able to speak to. If you cannot speak to everything in your design, then how do you know it is appropriate for your design? “Because”, and “Best Practice” are not complete answers.  I’ve collected a ton of tips along the way (like these) and each of them contributed to getting me as far as I’ve gotten at this point.  Social networking tools have helped immensely.  I can’t imagine going this alone in a vacuum.  I would have been totally unprepared for the design defense, if I even made it that far.

So after my defense, I was told “7 days” in regard to getting my results. I was hoping to be pleasantly surprised with results late Friday after the defenses at Mandalay Bay wrapped up.  However, having not received them yet and tomorrow is a holiday, it looks like it will take the full week (and hopefully not longer) to get the results.  It has been difficult waiting this long.  Anxiety is building and I’ve been watching email like a man possessed.  I’ve been replaying the scenarios in my head, both good and bad.  It’s unhealthy for sure. Although no formal statistics have been released by VMware, I gather through word of mouth that about 50% of the candidates pass their defense attempt, while the other 50% do not.  With two individuals from this past week already pronounced as having passed and becoming VCDX certified, the odds are starting to stack up against those like me who still wait for their results.  I’m trying to keep my mind occupied on other things but it is difficult.  I periodically take comfort in thinking about things far more important, like smiles on my childrens’ faces. For those that pass, I’m sure they look back upon the efforts as well spent and the reward of passing as well deserved.  I know that I have already benefited from what I have learned through the process. It has taught me to be more of a thinker which maps directly to my Design and Engineering role at work. I would love nothing more at this point than to have the VCDX certificate to go along with it.  I look at the VCDX as a highly coveted certification with a lot of integrity built into the program and process which is sure to last a long time. There is no possibility of a “paper VCDX” as far as I’m concerned. That means value for cert holders and businesses for many years to come.

Oh I almost forgot, I brought my own whiteboard dry erase marker on the trip and used it during my defense. I had been using it for practice on my whiteboard at home and thought it may bring me good luck in the defense. Shabby dry erase markers can be a distraction.  In addition, it has a fine eraser on the opposite end which comes in handy and can save time wiping away small details instead of using the huge brick eraser.  The panel didn’t seem to have any reservations with me using it.  Click the image to view a larger version.

Train Signal Releases vSphere Pro Vol 1

February 10th, 2010

Train Signal has released a new addition to its VMware library of training entitled VMware vSphere Pro Series Training Vol 1 which covers the topics of VMwareView, ThinApp, Nexus 1000V, and PowerCLI. The 11 hours of new content spans 20 videos and is authored by (in no particular order) industry recognized experts David Davis, Hal Rottenberg, and Rick Scherer.

General availability was February 9th meaning you can order today at an individual cost of $297, or purchase it in a bundle with Train Signal’s other vSphere videos for $594.

Here are two hints of what you’ll be getting with this new release:

Video 1 – Sample content from each of the 3 video authors in the course – a true overview of what you will see in the course featuring VMware View, Nexus 1000V, and PowerCLI.

Video 2 – “ThinApp your App in Under 5 minutes”

These are a great group of guys who really know there stuff. Order your copy of VMware vSphere Pro Series Training Vol 1 today!

TrainSignal vSphere Training DVD 1 Completed

October 23rd, 2009

This evening I finished viewing the first of three TrainSignal vSphere Training DVDs authored by VCP and CCIE David Davis. Having viewed TrainSignal’s last VMware Virtual Infrastructure training on VI3, I knew I was in for some good stuff.

DVD 1 starts off with introductions to the video’s instructor as well as a hypothetical company which is used as a focus and discussion point throughout the video series. Practical application of technologies to a role played scenario, the Wired Brain Coffee Company in this case, serves as positive reinforcement to the lessons being taught and is an effective method for knowledge retention, especially if the student is following along and working hands on in their own lab through the examples.

The video then sets a beginner’s pace as it covers VMware certification, virtualization basics. Moving on, it compares and contrasts VMware, Microsoft, and Citrix hypervisors. Beyond this comparison, the focus from here on out is on VMware products where a closer look is taken at the different components and tiers of vSphere.

Half way through the DVD, we’re finally to the point where we’re installing and configuring the vSphere products. One valuable offering from the video is a lesson describing the steps needed to install ESX and ESXi in VMware Workstation. This is what is called a nested hypervisor – an ESX(i) type 1 (bare metal) hypervisor running on top of a VMware Workstation type 2 (hosted) hypervisor. Nested hypervisors are not supported in production environments but they are quite helpful in lab, test, and portable environments.

Towards the end, lesson 17 provides a nice demonstration of a VMware Tools installation in a Linux guest operating system which isn’t nearly as straight forward as a VMware Tools on Windows installation. The last two lessons begin touching on some of the new advanced features that vSphere offers: Hot Add/Hot Plug virtual hardware and Host Profiles.

Thus far my feeling is this training is geared towards the beginner to intermediate level. I’m looking forward to DVD 2 where the instructor dives into more of the advanced design, configuration, and operational topics of VMware vSphere. I’ve attended VMware’s vSphere What’s New (2 day) and VMware’s vSphere Quick Start (5 day) classes. With approximately 150 new features making their debut in vSphere, I’ve yet to see anyone cover them all – that would be a tall order.

DVD 1 Lessons:

  1. Meet Your Instructor
  2. Our Scenario with the Wired Brain Coffee Company
  3. VMware Certification – Preparing for the VCP and VCDX
  4. Introduction to Virtualization
  5. Virtualization Products Compared
  6. VMware ESXi4 Free Edition for the SMB
  7. VMware vSphere 4 and ESX Essentials
  8. vSphere Management Options
  9. Installing the VMware vSphere Client
  10. Navigating vSphere Using the vSphere Client
  11. Running VMware ESX 4 in Workstation
  12. Installing VMware ESX 4
  13. Installing VMware ESXi Version 4
  14. Installing VMware vCenter 4
  15. vCenter4 – Configuring Your New Virtual Infrastructure
  16. Creating & Modifying Virtual Guest Machines
  17. Installing and Configuring VMware Tools
  18. Adding Virtual Machine Hardware with vSphere Hot Plug
  19. Using vSphere Host Profiles

VCDX Design Exam: been there, done that!

October 1st, 2009

Borrowing a blog post title from my friend in virtualization Duncan, I passed the VCDX Design exam this morning with a score of 369. A passing mark of 300 is required out of a total of 500. I had a lot of built up anxiety for this exam for a few reasons:

  1. Duncan Epping (mentioned above) had mentioned that he thought the Design exam was more difficult than the Enterprise exam. He’s already VCDX certified and he’s a VMware genius.
  2. I was at a loss as far as what to study. The blueprint covered topics that I felt were vague from a formal training or studying perspective. It implies the requirement of real world experience.

Therefore, my study method consisted of:

  1. 30 minutes looking over the VCDX Design blueprint
  2. 1 hour of brushing up on NPIV documentation
  3. 1 hour of reviewing virtualized Microsoft Cluster requirements
  4. A quick review of TCP/UDP ports used in VMware virtual infrastructure in the enterprise (including SQL, Oracle, SNMP, Syslog, AD, LDAP, NFS, iSCSI, etc.)
  5. Knowledge of vSphere must be thrown out. Candidates need to remember this is clearly a VI3 exam.
  6. 13 years broad IT experience, 8 years experience with VMware products, 5 years experience with ESX

Once in the exam room, I found it to be less difficult than the Enterprise exam (which felt more like a Red Hat exam than a VMware exam). I surmise Duncan’s experience was different as English is not his native language (although he speaks it exceptionally well) and there is a lot of reading and interpretation of data on this exam. There were also a decent share of short and to the point questions as well. While I admit I didn’t have the best score, I found many of the questions to be pretty simple and not what I expected on an advanced level certification exam. Part way into the exam I felt fairly comfortable about passing given the degree of difficulty I had thus far experienced and assuming this experience would continue through to the end.

The exam format is two parts:

  1. Part 1 consists of 51 multiple choice/multiple select questions. In this section also exists several drag and drop style questions. One of the drag and drop questions was missing an obvious correct component and had a duplicate of another. I don’t believe this was intentional. I commented on this question with the corrections needed.
  2. Part 2 consists of a Visio-like architecture design tool where you freehand place components for a customer design. There is an assload of reading and a poor presentation of the requirements and the actual design drawing all on one small screen – probably good practice when in front of customers who either don’t know what they want, or don’t easily convey what they want. I spent 27 minutes on the last design question and ended up running out of time. I highly doubt 100% accuracy of my design as I ran out of time before I was comfortable with it. Jon Hall, if you’re reading this, I’m curious to know what the grading scale is between the 51 questions and the final design.

So that’s it. I’m on to the VCDX Design application step once VMware invites me (I hear the design application is very lengthy documentation writing and takes about 2 solid weeks to complete – following the advice of other existing VCDX’s on Twitter, the application is NOT an area to skimp on), and then the final defense step after that.

I’m an end user and not in front of customers daily. Consulting is solid experience to have for the VCDX process. I think the VCDX is designed for consultants, therefore, consultants are set up well and have an inherent advantage. Wish me luck, I’ll need it.

VCP4 Exam

September 5th, 2009

After a moderate beta phase, the VCP4 exam officially went public at VMworld 2009. Late Wednesday evening after the VMworld party, I decided that since VMware was offering the VCP4 exam at the Moscone Center at a heavily discounted rate, I would give it a shot first thing Thursday morning in lieu of attending the morning sessions. Passing this exam was on my development objectives for 2009 (along with VCDX certification) and time is starting to run out. OK, to be completely honest, the number of tweets I had seen recently of those who passed the VCP4 exam at VMworld as well as the beta made me a bit jealous and filled me with both encouragement and confidence.

My normal approach to certification is reading books and lab time. Although I hadn’t studied for the exam or even looked at the blueprint (a swell recipe for failure, I personally wouldn’t recommend it), I have been using vSphere 4 quite a bit in my home lab over the past several months. I also attended the two day “What’s New” vSphere course via WebEx but I don’t believe it provided a lot value towards the VCP4 exam.

In addition, I studied for, sat, and passed the Enterprise exam a little over a month ago which in my opinion was quite a bit more difficult than the VCP3 exam. Technically speaking, the Enterprise exam covers VI3 and not vSphere, but conceptually there is still plenty of overlap between VI3 and vSphere 4

Lastly, I had been toying with and troubleshooting the vSphere virtual infrastructure that VCDX #7 Duncan Epping provided attendees at the vExpert booth in the VMworld 2009 Solutions Exchange. As luck would have it, some of the things I was working on applied to the VCP4 exam and were fresh in my mind.

I passed the exam with a score of 350 out of a possible 500. A score of 300 or better is required to pass the exam and a score of 350 is required to be eligible for VMware Certified Instructor (VCI) status. This appears to be the same new grading curve used in the Enterprise exam and I imagine the Design exam for VCDX candidates (I have not sat the Design exam yet so I’m not 100% certain on that).

In a word, my experience was that I found the exam to be fair. 85 questions. 90 minutes. All multiple choice/multiple select, a few with exhibits. No interactive/hands-on/live lab scenarios although I would have preferred them. In comparison it was a degree tougher than the VCP3 exam. I attribute that to the fact that the vSphere content is new and I hadn’t properly prepared. Special thanks to the candidate who blurted on his way out of the exam room as I was walking in “This exam is REALLY HARD – definitely NO JOKE”. You made me feel as if I had just kissed $105 goodbye. :roll:

As with the Enterprise exam, I found time to be a threat as I was left with only three minutes to review about 20 questions I had marked. Poor exam time management seems to be a recurring theme with me lately where it wasn’t in my earlier years. I’m not sure if the exams are getting harder or I’m just getting slower in my old age. Probably a combination of both. Lately I tend to go into deep thought for a number of minutes on some questions. Instead, I should recognize that if the answer doesn’t come to me within 10 seconds, I should quickly choose the best answer, mark the question, and move on. I think the dilemma becomes that sometimes there is more than one best answer and that’s where I end back up in the deep thought.

For passing the exam, VMware gave me an additional VMworld pin, a “VCP4 certified” baseball cap, and flashy VCP battery powered glasses which my 3 year old daughter absolutely loves. Thank you VMware.

Update 10/5/09:  VCI pass mark is 350, not 400. This has been corrected in the paragraph above.

VCDX Enterprise Administration Exam

August 5th, 2009

In my pursuit for VCDX (VMware Certified Design Expert) certification, I sat this exam on Tuesday July 21st at 8am. I read somewhere that statistically speaking, humans are better test takers in the morning than in the afternoon. This statistic applies to me. I’ve passed every certification exam I’ve sat before noon and the only exam I’ve ever failed was Microsoft Networking Essentials in 1997 and that was an afternoon exam.

Anyway, the Enterprise Administration exam is part written, part hands on lab. Because of the lab piece, it takes VMware 10-12 business days to grade the exam. My exam was no exception. On business day 11, today, I receive the results this morning on my Blackberry while in a VMware BCS support meeting. The initial email read:

Hello Jason,

Thank you for participating in the VMware Certified Design Expert (VCDX) program. Attached you will find your score report for the Enterprise Administration Exam. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding your score.

Kind Regards
The VMware Certification Team

My initial thought was this doesn’t sound good. Every other blog post I read from people who passed this exam stated they were greeted with “Congratulations” meaning they had passed. My notification basically looked to me like “Thanks for the 400 bucks, your failed score is in the attached .PDF document, contact us if you need suicide prevention”. Don’t take that literally, I’m being dramatic here. The fact is, after taking this exam, I was not at all confident I had passed. In fact, I had returned to the office that morning pretty upset with myself. It was clear to me that on the written exam, I hadn’t drilled down deep enough into some of the blueprint topics, mainly topics dealing with Red Hat Enterprise Linux as well as identifying multiple methods to pull the same information through different CLI commands. As other bloggers have pointed out, the written exam makes up 60% of the passing grade. The hands on lab portion of the exam, for me anyway, was much more familiar although I won’t say it’s a cake walk. It gets into advanced administration and troubleshooting situations which you won’t always find solutions spelled out explicitly in a book. You’re on your own in a live lab to assemble what you feel is the solution. You can get creative and 10 different candidates may solve a lab problem 10 slightly different ways. What counts is what the lab proctor finds in your resulting virtual infrastructure come grading time. Either you satisfied the outlined requirement through your processes, or you didn’t. The lab accounts for the other 40% of the passing grade.

After the first day went by, I was no longer depressed. I focused on my work and other things realizing there was nothing I could do to change my prior performance in the exam room. If I had failed, it is what it is, I accept it, and I clearly knew what areas needed more attention. $400 is a tough learning experience though, for me the cost of this endeavor adds pressure. As the days passed, it became clear VMware really was going to stick to its 10-12 business day grading policy, and I wasn’t going to receive my results early.

So I opened up the attached .PDF score report on my Blackberry. Of course, it opens slowly adding more drama and suspense. However, in the end I was pleased to see:

Congratulations on passing this exam. Passing this exam is the second of the four parts
required to achieve the VMware Certified Design Expert designation. The next
component is the VMware Design Exam. You will be sent registration information to this
exam when it is publicly released in August 2009.

No doubt I was stoked to see I had passed but my focus quickly turned to my score.  I had been thinking that in the remote possibility I had passed this exam, then it was going to be by the hair of my chin. The score report showed I wasn’t nearly as close to the pass/fail threshold as I thought I’d be. I had plenty of buffer with my score and I think I owe my passing grade plus the additional buffer to the lab portion of the exam which I feel I was perfect on. By the way, I had no time to spare on this exam. I was working on the last of the 11 lab problems 5 seconds before time ran out on my exam. I wasted significant time in deep thought during the written part of the exam and almost didn’t leave enough time to complete the labs – I really had to rush through the labs. My lab was also having technical issues which added several minutes of delay and anxiety at one point as a vCenter task sat there hung for several minutes which a successful configuration was dependent on (I don’t believe this was intended to be part of the lab experience).

If you are interested in taking this exam and you’re looking for some study material, Duncan Epping has this recent post which is pretty comprehensive although the first link to the study guide appears to need fixing and the study guide is one of the best resources in the list. Also, as Duncan points out, in hind sight I also feel the DSA course would have been incredibly beneficial in addressing this exam’s objectives.

Now I move on to the Design written exam.  I am waiting for VMware to schedule this for me.  It will probably take a few weeks for that to happen which is just fine because I’m very busy right now at work, at home, and getting things ready for VMworld (I’ve got a little surprise for the VMware community I’ve been working on).  I expect the Design exam to be a little bit more theory and high level concepts rather than detailed CLI commands and switches.  I’ve also heard from one person they felt the Design exam was more difficult than the Enterprise Administration exam.  I’ve got my work cut out for me. At no time did I expect this would be easy.

Train Signal training discount through the month of February

January 31st, 2009

Train Signal is offering an astounding 25% off any virtualization product they sell through the month of February 2009.

Here is a short sample of their VMware ESX training video where instructor David Davis talks about templates and cloning virtual machines:

To take advantage of the 25% off, use the code BOCHENET at checkout.

I know first hand that the economy is tough.  Take advantage of this offer and get top shelf training for your dollar.  Train Signal offers a 90 day money back guarantee if you are not completely satisfied.

Coolest VMware video training trailer ever

November 19th, 2008

If nothing else gets you excited about VMware virtualization, this video by Elias Khnaser should.  It seriously looks like a good DVD for the whole family.  I’ve asked Elias for the Blue-Ray version.